Food & Beverage Companies Doing Business in California Need a Prop 65 Strategy

Back to Legal Insights
Back to Legal Insights

Stoel Rives attorney Melissa Jones discussed in the application of California's Proposition 65 ("Prop 65") – the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 – to food and beverage manufacturers.

Jones describes why Prop 65 is so problematic for companies. First, the law lists more than 850 chemicals the state has determined cause cancer or reproductive harm, with most lacking any safe harbor content levels. Second, Prop 65 empowers private litigants to enforce its terms, even in the absence of any showing that consumers have been harmed or exposed to any material risk. Third, the warning requirement makes it likely consumers will be alarmed, particularly in the case of food and beverage products. Finally, the law is very expensive for companies to defend, since a plaintiff need only demonstrate that a product sold without a warning contains one of the chemicals on the state's list in order to shift the burden of proof regarding safety to the defendant company.

Accordingly, Jones urges companies to take concrete action to minimize the risk of Prop 65 lawsuits. She recommends companies carefully track Prop 65 trends and confirm whether their products contain chemicals on the state's list.

Read the full article

"Any food and beverage manufacturer who sells products in California can be sued," was posted by, April 9, 2012.

Key Contributors

Melissa A. Jones
See all contributors See less contributors
Saved Pages

Use the arrows to arrange content.  Download pages as a .pdf file or share links via email..

{{ item.Title }} {{ item.AttorneyPosition }}, {{ item.AttorneyLocation }} , C. {{ item.AttorneyCell }} , P. {{ item.AttorneyPhone }} , F. {{ item.AttorneyFax }} {{ item.TypeText }} Remove
You have no pages saved
            {{ state | json }}